Commit 7066bd5c by Miriam

### changed a view formulations

parent cde7218a
 ... ... @@ -71,11 +71,10 @@ \only<1>{The intuitionistic modal logic $\ikop Z$: \begin{itemize} \item All intuitionistic tautologies \item All intuitionistic tautologies and axiom Z \item Closure under MP and substitution \item Closure under generalization: If $A$ valid, then $\Box A$ valid. \item $\Box (A \rightarrow B) \rightarrow (\Box A \rightarrow \Box B)$ \item s(Z) for all substitutions s \end{itemize}} \only<2>{Kripke-Semantics for $\ikop Z$: ... ... @@ -145,7 +144,7 @@ \end{frame} \begin{frame}{Natural Deduction for $\ikop Z$} The only rule for box: The only rule for box, as proposed by Bellin, De Paiva and Ritter: %(forall f, In f F -> KIbox Z G (|[]| f)) -> KIbox Z F h -> KIbox Z G (|[]| h) \begin{prooftree} ... ... @@ -220,7 +219,7 @@ \item[adequateness] $\adequate{Z}{t}$ {\scriptsize(..for a certain class of axioms)} \end{description} \end{block} \end{block}\pause Translations: \begin{itemize} ... ... @@ -271,7 +270,7 @@ $\Rightarrow$ sufficient to show adequateness for one translation \end{block} Most important: Technical work: \begin{itemize} \item $\ikop Z \vdash \dneg (\dneg A \land \dneg B) \leftrightarrow \dneg (A \land B)$ \item $\ikop Z \vdash \dneg (\dneg A \lor \dneg B) \leftrightarrow \dneg (A \lor B)$ ... ...
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!